But I dislike the feeling that Parallels is perpetually asking for more of my money.PALO ALTO, CA -(Marketwired - August 25, 2015) - VMware, Inc. I can, of course, say no to any or all of this. I can do the same thing with Fusion using an inexpensive VNC client for my iPad-a one-time purchase-although admittedly the setup is less convenient.
#Vmfusion 8 pro windows for mac trial
And if I want to use Parallels Access to control my Mac or virtual machines on my iPad, that will cost me another $80 per year after the free six-month trial period (though Parallels does sometimes offer discounts).
#Vmfusion 8 pro windows for mac software
But Parallels also offers Mac antivirus software with the same free-for-now, pay-later scheme. So for someone like me who has multiple Macs, Parallels ends up being way more expensive, both initially and with each annual upgrade.īoth products come with free subscriptions to Windows antivirus software, with the option to pay for continued access once the subscription expires. Fusion, on the other hand, is licensed (for personal use) per user. Parallels costs more than Fusion, and it’s licensed on a per Mac basis. Parallels lets you run one operating system (including another version of OS X) inside another. But unless I explicitly ask it to, Fusion leaves absolutely nothing loaded or running when the app is closed. Parallels installs just one kernel extension (unless I use the optional Parallels Access feature, which adds further background processes). VirtualBox installs four kernel extensions at startup, which remain loaded constantly even if I never use the app.
Parallels, for example, automatically adds a folder of Windows applications to my Dock without my permission, so I have to remove it manually. Similarly, any clutter, background processes, or other doohickeys that intrude upon my normal, day-to-day Mac use are a disadvantage. So many of the advanced user interface tricks that virtualization software provide are wasted on me. Furthermore, I don’t need Windows programs to appear as though they were native Mac applications (using, for example, Parallels’ Coherence mode or Fusion’s Unity view) I prefer to keep Windows in its own virtual display and to run Windows apps inside that. That means I’m not going to nitpick about the small differences in performance that might exist between one tool and the next. So, what am I looking for in a virtualization environment? For starters, I’m concerned only with conventional business apps-I don’t use virtualization for gaming, 3D graphics, or anything else that would tax virtual processors or graphics cards. VirtualBox is functional, but it isn’t as polished as VMware Fusion or Parallels Desktop. More specifically, it has a user interface only a developer could love, its performance isn’t even in the same ballpark as its two commercial competitors, and it requires quite a bit of fiddling to get basic settings right-something I never have to think about with Parallels or Fusion. Although it looks great on paper, and the price (free) is certainly right, to me it feels rough and unfinished. In its last couple of comparisons, Macworld has concluded that Parallels and Fusion are virtually equivalent, the differences increasingly minor with each revision. I’ve seen many comparative reviews, benchmark tests, and feature checklists for these products. I just want to get my work done in the most efficient way possible, with a minimum of distraction and complication.) I have no particular allegiance to one developer or another. I have also been a Parallels user almost since its very first release. (By way of disclosure, I should mention that I wrote books about Fusion versions 2 and 3 it’s now at version 6. But I did want to explain why I’ve settled on VMWare Fusion as my go-to virtualization choice.
Each of these products has its partisans, and I’m not going to tell you definitively which one you should choose. Using any of those three, I can pop into another OS as easily as launching an app. In addition to OS X’s Boot Camp, I have my choice of three virtualization products for Mac: Parallels Desktop, VMware Fusion, or Oracle’s VirtualBox. Fortunately, as a Mac user, I have several ways to run multiple operating systems without switching computers. My work requires me to occasionally use Windows and Linux, as well as older versions of OS X.
0 kommentar(er)
